psychiatry for lawyers .com
  home page The Author Reports contact us  
 
Introductory
 classification

 definition

 FAQs

 glossary

 psychiatric injury- medical

 treatment: general aspects

Medicolegal
 assessment process

 diagnosis & function

 causation

 forensic

 Mental Health Act

 psychiatric negligence

 psychiatric negligence 2

 psychiatric injury- legal

 psychiatric injury- legal 2

 capacity



Dr David Gill Dr Gill is an NHS Consultant, with a medico-legal practice.
Classification of mental disorder

print view

INTRODUCTION In a few psychiatric conditions, there is there is an underlying physical cause, which is well understood and agreed. This includes, for example:
  • Alzheimerís Disease, which is caused by physical degeneration of specific cells in the brain, leading to dementia
  • Downís Syndrome, where the person is born with 3 copies of chromosome 21, instead of 2, leading to learning disability

In the vast majority of mental disorders, however, there is no single clear cause. Even in the examples given, the precise mechanism whereby the physical or chemical abnormality gives rise to the clinical features is not completely understood.

It follows therefore, that classification of mental disorder cannot be based on cause alone.

PSYCHIATRIC CLASSIFICATIONS Current international systems of classifying psychiatric illness such as DSM or ICD (see below) recognise this. They are essentially descriptive, and do not make assumptions about the presumed causes of the various illnesses.

They are the cumulative result of many years of research and observation, and refinement through successive editions. They represent the collective opinions of experts about how the various categories within them can best be codified so as to fit as closely as possible the observed patient data.

In practice, "recognised psychiatric illness" nowadays does not mean the views of the (potentially idiosyncratic) individual expert, however eminent. It means a condition described in one of the two major classifications, DSM or ICD.

The expert does need to refer to one of the classifications in his report. If a diagnosis is made, the numerical code attached to that diagnosis should be given. A copy of the section from the ICD or DSM should be appended to the report.

It should go without saying that if the diagnosis of say F32, depressive episode is made, then the clinical features of this condition as laid down by the ICD must be clearly recorded in the report.

If this is not the case, the report may appear inconsistent and/or poorly argued, and thence be vulnerable to adverse criticism.

DSM stands for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Fourth Edition, known as DSM-IV, of the American Psychiatric Association.

ICD stands for International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, known as ICD10. It is produced by the World Health Organisation, and is the official classification for the rest of the world, including the UK NHS.

Availability ICD10 is free online. DSM IV is available by subscription only, though unofficial versions do exist on the internet.

DSM vs ICD Until the publication of DSMIII in 1980, US psychiatry, as previously indicated, was heavily influenced by Freudian and other psychoanalytic theories. Although of continuing interest to many, these theories are now agreed to be without scientific basis.

DSM since then has "caught up" with ICD in eschewing theory in favour of observation. It has gained in influence relative to ICD, possibly outstripping it in certain aspects, such as its multiaxial system (see below). DSM has also brought to prominence now-familiar terms such as "major depression" and "PTSD".

DSM is sometimes seen as more rigourous, in that, as set out on page xxx of the introduction, it requires that, in order to constitute a diagnosis, symptoms should be not just "an understandable reaction", bearing in mind the person's culture and circumstances. This introduces a threshold, which has to be crossed for symptoms to constitute a diagnosis.

ILLNESS OR UNDERSTANDABLE REACTION? Although the point is not made as explicitly in the ICD as it is in the DSM, the distinction between illness and understandable reaction is a very important one in routine clinical practice, where it must be made every day. It is also vital in medicolegal work. Not everyone, for example, who is upset after an accident, is necessarily diagnosable with a mental disorder.

DSM IS MULTIAXIAL Unlike ICD, which has just one ěaxisî on which to code for mental disorder, DSM has 5 axes.

Axis I: mental illnesses, an illness being defined as a state of impaired health with a clear onset following a period of normal function.

Axis II: for recording (in the jargon, "coding") the presence or absence of personality disorder(s) and learning disability (the latter was formerly called mental handicap or retardation); here, the abnormalities are permanent, and are apparent from adolescence or earlier.

Axis III: Physical health problems.

Axis IV: Psychosocial and Environmental Problems "is for reporting psychosocial and environmental stressors that may affect the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of mental disorders".

Axis V: Global Assessment of Functioning Scale "is for reporting the clinician's judgement of the individual's overall level of functioning and carrying out activities of daily living. This information is useful in planning treatment and measuring its impact, and in predicting outcome."

The DSM is sometimes referred to in reports, though usually just relating to Axis I. Reports should explain the terms DSM and ICD, and why they are being used.

Both classifications are regarded as valid for UK use. The ICD is the official classification for the UK NHS. It would not be generally accepted that one was better than the other for medicolegal purposes.

CAVEATS CONCERNING DSM AND ICD These systems are guides only, describing "conditions coming to the attention of psychiatrists". They are designed to summarise the assessment of the clinician, and to improve research and communication.

They were not designed specifically for medicolegal use.

They are not intended for lay use; they are not "cookbooks", which dispense with the need for the psychiatric expert, any more than a collection of law books makes the services of a lawyer unnecessary. Thus, ICD and DSM are only properly used when they are interpreted by the seasoned clinician in the light of experience and expertise.

"Best estimates" rather immutable scientific truths, there are differences between DSM and ICD, and between successive editions. They are ultimately no more than continually developing consensus statements of committees of researchers, but nevertheless do form a useful summary of the "state of the art".

Real patients seldom fit with complete neatness into the categories; indeed, patients may have more than one diagnosis, as the categories are not mutually exclusive.

PSYCHOSIS VS. NEUROSIS is another key concept in understanding the classification systems.

PSYCHOSIS In psychosis (e.g. schizophrenia), the patient has lost touch with reality. They experience delusions (unshakeable false beliefs) and/or unreal perceptions (e.g. hallucinations such as hearing voices when no-one is around). The connections between their thoughts may be disrupted ("formal thought disorder"). This is a severe illness, and approximates to the lay idea of "madness". The patient does not realise that they are unwell ("lacks insight").

ěPsychosisî and ěpsychoticî are still ěrespectableî terms, widely used in clinical practice and in the ICD and DSM.

NEUROSIS by contrast, is generally less severe and much more common. The patient is free from delusions and hallucinations- they know that their worries or depressive thoughts, for example, are excessive for the reality of the circumstances, and therefore recognise them as irrational. The vast majority of cases of anxiety and depression are of this type.

Use of terms such as "neuroticî or "neurotic depression" is less frequent because of the pejorative connotations the word has accquired in lay use. (this is a frequent occurrence in psychiatry; "paranoid" is the latest escapee from the textbooks to the street. Even "lunatic" was originally a technical term.)

Accordingly, the word neurotic or neurosis, would not be used frequently in clinical or medicolegal practice. The distinction between psychotic and nonpsychotic states remains vitally important, however, but normally, the presence of psychosis will be made clear in the report.

The word ěneurosisî still occurs in the ICD, though not the DSM, as part of the rather unwieldy title ěNeurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders

Mental Disorders
 alcohol misuse

 anxiety & PTSD

 CBT & psychotherapy

 dementia & delirium

 depression

 drug misuse

 drug treatment

 eating disorders

 ECT & psychosurgery

 medication

 mental health services

 old age psychiatry

 paranoid states

 personality disorder

 prognosis

 psychological treatment

 schizophrenia

 sexual problems

 suicide and self-harm

 women's health

 
       
       
psychiatryforlawyers.com   home  feedback  the author  reports  training  contact    
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER This website is provided in good faith for general information only, based on Dr Gill's understanding of psychiatry in the UK. It does not represent the views of any organisation with which he has a relationship. It is not to be taken as advice or opinion on any specific case or issue whatsoever. In particular, material provided about the method of assessment in medicolegal cases or about any other matters is not to be taken out of context. Opinion expressed by Dr. Gill in an individual medicolegal case and method of assessment may adhere to or depart from the material on this website entirely according to his professional judgement. Nothing on this website forms part of his terms and conditions for medicolegal work, let alone part of his reports. Nor does Dr. Gill holds himself out as an authority on these matters. Other views undoubtedly exist on most if not all matters covered, which may be just as valid as his. No liability is accepted for any use of this website, or for any error or omission. By using the site, you agree to these terms. The text partly derives from Outline of Psychiatry, a textbook originated by Dr Jenny Barroclough, later prepared jointly, and the most recent edition by Dr Gill.


 
Copyright © Dr David Gill. All rights reserved.